Frazier Deeter CPAs and Advisors


1230 Peachtree Street NE

Suite 1500

Atlanta, GA 30309

main 404.253.7500


3480 Preston Ridge Road

Suite 375

Alpharetta, GA 30005

main 404.573.4200


401 Commerce Street

Suite 920

Nashville, TN 37219

main 615.259.7600


2801 W. Busch Boulevard

Tampa, FL 33618


FASB reaches conclusions at Jan 31 meeting

At today's Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) meeting the FASB completed deliberations on several topics. Two of the more important conclusions regarded going concern and fair value disclosure requirements for nonpublic entities.

Going Concern

The Board instructed the FASB Staff to draft a proposed Accounting Standard Update (ASU) to be issued for public comment regarding going concern. The ASU would require management to assess the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern as of each reporting date. If existing events or conditions indicate it is more-likely-than-not that the entity may not be able to meet its obligations within a reasonable period of time from the reporting date (date of the balance sheet), disclosures would have to be provided. 

The more-likely-than-not threshold is lower than the probable threshold. In other accounting guidance, it is generally interpreted to mean great than a 50% chance of occurrence, while probably is considered much higher. Currently, there are no specific requirements in GAAP for such an assessment. Most of the current guidance around going concern considerations is found in the audit guidance. 

If the ASU is eventually adopted, and we believe it will be, look to the auditing bodies, specifically the PCAOB and the Auditing Standards Board (of the AICPA) to issue revised auditing guidance regarding going concern.

Nonpublic Entities and Fair Value Disclosure Requirement

When ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs, was issued, it contained a requirement to disclose the level of the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurements are categorized in their entirety (Level 1, 2, or 3)‖for financial instruments where fair value is required to be disclosed. This was required even for financial instruments that were not required to be measured at fair value in the balance sheet.

The FASB has affirmed that this disclosure requirement is not applicable to nonpublic entities.  With this decision, the FASB shows an emerging understanding that the reporting requirements of nonpublic financial statements will not always be the same as public companies.  Given this recent trend, preparers of nonpublic financial statements can take encouragement that their concerns are being heard. We will continue to monitor these developments.

For more information about complex accounting and disclosure requirements such as FASB deliberations, or other accounting developments, please email Bill Godshall, Lead Quality Control Partner and leader of our Public Company Audit and Advisory Practice at


FASBgoing concernBill GodshallNonpublic entitiesaccounting standards



CPA based investment management
Frazier & Deeter, a Top 100 Largest CPA Firm in the United States, has accountants and business advisors who offer a full range of assurance and advisory services in the areas of audit, tax and management consulting and personal tax planning and compliance. As a leading accounting firm, we serve clients across the nation and internationally that include closely-held companies, SEC companies, and nonprofit entities. Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, we have been recognized as the 56th largest accounting firm in the nation, as one of the Top 25 Best Managed CPA firms in the country, and one of the Best Accounting Firms to Work for in the U.S.
Secure File Transfer
best firm to work for IPA Top 100 FirmsIPA Best of the Best 2015Top100Accountingfirm
©2016 Frazier & Deeter, LLC. All Rights Reserved.